首页> 外文OA文献 >Assessment of academic departments efficiency using data envelopment analysis
【2h】

Assessment of academic departments efficiency using data envelopment analysis

机译:使用包络分析使用数据评估学术部门

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose: In this age of knowledge economy, universities play an important role in the development of a country. As government subsidies to universities have been decreasing, more efficient use of resources becomes important for university administrators. This study evaluates the relative technical efficiencies of academic departments at the Islamic University in Gaza (IUG) during the years 2004-2006.\udDesign/methodology/approach: This study applies Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to assess the relative technical efficiency of the academic departments. The inputs are operating expenses, credit hours and training resources, while the outputs are number of graduates, promotions and public service activities. The potential improvements and super efficiency are computed for inefficient and efficient departments respectively. Further, multiple linear -regression is used to develop a relationship between super efficiency and input and output variables.\udFindings: Results show that the average efficiency score is 68.5% and that there are 10 efficient departments out of the 30 studied. It is noted that departments in the faculty of science, engineering and information technology have to greatly reduce their laboratory expenses. The department of economics and finance was found to have the highest super efficiency score among the efficient departments.\udFinally, it was found that promotions have the greatest contribution to the super\udefficiency scores while public services activities come next.\udResearch limitations/implications: The paper focuses only on academic\uddepartments at a single university. Further, DEA is deterministic in nature.\udPractical implications: The findings offer insights on the inputs and outputs that\udsignificantly contribute to efficiencies so that inefficient departments can focus on\udthese factors.\udOriginality/value: Prior studies have used only one type of DEA (BCC) and they\uddid not explicitly answer the question posed by the inefficient departments "Which\udof the resources should be given priority so that these inefficient DMUs become\udefficient?". This study uses both (BCC) and (CCR) in addition to relating\udefficiencies to input and output variables.
机译:目的:在知识经济时代,大学在国家发展中发挥着重要作用。随着政府对大学的补贴不断减少,对大学管理者来说,更有效地利用资源变得至关重要。这项研究评估了2004-2006年间加沙伊斯兰大学(IUG)学术部门的相对技术效率。\ udDesign / methodology / approach:此研究应用数据包络分析(DEA)来评估加沙地带的相对技术效率。学术部门。投入是运营费用,学时和培训资源,而产出是毕业生人数,晋升和公共服务活动。分别针对效率低下的部门和效率高的部门计算潜在的改进和超效率。此外,使用多元线性回归来建立超效率与输入和输出变量之间的关系。\ udFindings:结果表明,平均效率得分为68.5%,在研究的30个部门中,有10个效率部门。值得注意的是,科学,工程和信息技术学院的部门必须大大减少他们的实验室费用。在经济部门中,经济和财政部门的超级效率得分最高。\ ud最后,晋升对超级\效率得分的贡献最大,而公共服务活动次之。\ ud研究的局限/含意:本文仅针对一所大学的学术\系。进一步,DEA本质上是确定性的。\ ud实际意义:研究结果提供了对输入和输出的洞察力,而这些输入和输出极大地提高了效率,因此效率低下的部门可以专注于这些因素。\ ud原始性/价值:以前的研究仅使用一种类型DEA(BCC),他们没有明确回答效率低下的部门提出的问题:“应该给哪个/优先级的资源,以便使这些效率低下的DMU变得\ ud效率?”。除了将\效率与输入和输出变量相关之外,本研究还使用了(BCC)和(CCR)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号